source: The Willits News, June 22, 2017
Earlier this month the Eureka Times Standard reported the Arcata City Council adopted an ordinance making Arcata a sanctuary city.
According
to the news report, a round of applause rang out in the council
chambers after the council voted 3-1, with one councilman dissenting, to
pass the sanctuary ordinance.
Contrast this with Willits City Council which recently passed a resolution by a 3-2 vote championed by Councilwoman Saprina Rodriguez
affirming a commitment to non-discrimination and supporting immigrants
in the community. The resolution was passed by City Council late last
month, but not without controversy.
Although Rodriguez said she had to fight to get the item on the
council’s agenda, on the night of the May 24 meeting, Mayor Gerry
Gonzalez had announced that he was pulling the item from the agenda on
advice from City Attorney Jim Lance.
Gonzalez took issue with the
original resolution’s wording which he felt could potentially result in
the city losing federal grant funding. Although the mayor had pulled
the item from the agenda, fellow council members and members of the
public in attendance urged him to proceed with the discussion of the
resolution. By all accounts, by the time the item was brought back for
discussion, a crowd of residents seeking to give input on the matter had
thinned out. Some went home in disappointment upon hearing the item had
been originally pulled.
Rodriguez said she let her fellow council members know she felt
pulling the item was not OK and it was also an abuse of Gonzalez’
authority.
A controversial paragraph in the resolution which in
part stated the Willits Police Department would continue its
long-standing practice of not participating or aiding in the enforcement
of federal immigration laws was revised, taking out the phrase “long
standing practice.”
Rodriguez is to be commended for her staunch
determination to bring the Willits City Council in alignment with many
cities in the state and the nation with regards to supporting their
immigrant populations.
The councilwoman said she felt it was her obligation to bring the
resolution forward, despite being shut down initially by Gonzalez. She
said she gave a draft copy of the resolution to Lance and City Manager
Adrienne Moore on May 10, but the item had to make its way through a
process before it could make its way to the council’s agenda for the May
24 meeting.
Even though Hispanics and other minorities comprise a
lower percentage of Willit’s population and demographics, as Rodriguez
correctly points out, there was clearly enough interest in the issue as
an immigration town hall held in late March turned out to be one of the
highest attended events in recent years, despite a low attendance by the
population it was intended to serve.
We can hardly blame Hispanics and immigrants for staying away
from this and other forums held throughout Mendocino County, despite
reassurances from Sheriff Tom Allman and other law enforcement and
county officials that they will have no direct involvement in carrying
out federal immigration law in the wake of a federal executive order
signed by President Donald Trump this January, there has been great
confusion spreading over social media regarding possible ICE raids in
Lake County.
I believe Rodriguez is also correct in her assertion
that the loss of federal funds is an overplayed argument in opposition
to these types of resolutions.
As public sentiment throughout the nation evolves and changes,
support for local resolutions has increased from cities across the
nation and they continue to be approved at a rapid race.
Gonzalez
and other local leaders in Willits have advocated for restraint,
fearing the loss of federal funds and citing direction from
organizations like the League of California Cities in regards to
adopting a sanctuary city ordinance, but as Rodriguez said, the threat
of federal funding should not be a critical factor in adopting a
resolution when it comes to safeguarding residents and allaying mass
fear or confusion.
Leaders don’t always make a decision based on funding, and
Willits is not out on an island, nor would it be alone in supporting its
immigrant population - joining cities like Santa Rosa and Windsor which
have passed similar resolutions or declared themselves as sanctuary
cities, despite threats from the federal government.
I add myself to the list of those whom Rodriguez said have overwhelmingly thanked her for her moral leadership.
Showing posts with label city council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label city council. Show all posts
Monday, June 26, 2017
Thursday, August 08, 2013
Michele Martinez speaks about Improving Santa Ana
One of the cool stories I got to do this summer was an interview with Santa Ana Councilwoman Michele Martinez. An excerpt of the interview which made it to print follows.
BY ARIEL CARMONA JR. / FOR THE REGISTER
Councilwoman Michele Martinez, 31, says great changes are coming to the city – especially when it comes to health. The city is making major strides, she said, in increasing park space and in its commitment to a resolution passed by the City Council in 2011 that advocates for policies that improve residents' health. Here's what Martinez, who also serves as the director of the Alliance for a Healthy Orange County, had to say.
Q. Does the city receive state or other funding for health-related programs?
A. We really don't have any funding sources for health
programs. What we've done is used our public works, planning and parks
and recreations departments. They have all collaborated to get grants,
whether it be for bike lanes or walk and bike studies. We also partnered
with the school district to get Garfield and Willard and Walker
community centers. So we have the parks and the community centers that
during the day the schools utilize and at night the community then takes
over. We got state grants for that.
Q. How is the city addressing walking and biking?
A. We as a council made a commitment to integrating complete streets in the city. We passed a resolution. We are also updating our circulation elements which will include a bike and pedestrian master plan, for the first time ever. It's our commitment to active transportation.
Q. How does the city recognize those that promote healthy lifestyles?
A. We've had a committee in place for the past two years, of nonprofits and businesses, that gives input in how to move the city forward. It was instrumental in creating a smoke-free park zone. (She also points to Active Living in Santa Ana, Safe and Active Living United District, and Building Healthy Communities as key health groups.)
Q. What's being done to increase the number of parks in the city?
A. We knew that we were going to have issues, such as the lack of open space, that created issues with kids being overweight – and another issue is the safety component. There is a gang problem and drug problem in the city because it's an urban city and so that also affects the quality of life of young people and their families. (Some) are scared even with the park access that they do have. So we are having to address these issues all at once. We are addressing them with a holistic approach, with a partnership with the school district (and) the various nonprofits, because at the end of the day, we know that the city government can't do it all, it has to be a collaborative effort, a personal effort from the residents themselves.
Q. Why are plans being put into motion now?
A. As the director of the Alliance, I am going back and asking, 'What is it that this city accomplished? What is that other cities accomplished? If they haven't gotten anywhere, what can my organization do to help them?' We realize that there are issues with funding, we know cities have taken a big hit. So we have these city regulations from several years ago. We're saying let's backtrack because we need to keep out in the forefront. Santa Ana has been a model for the county. Being a council member for the city, I have the opportunity to hold my city accountable and to ensure that we are moving in the right direction and really setting some policies that can be a model that we make a commitment to. The fruits of labor have really come to the forefront for Santa Ana because of the dedicated staff that we have and also my colleagues on the council and their commitment to public health.
BY ARIEL CARMONA JR. / FOR THE REGISTER
Councilwoman Michele Martinez, 31, says great changes are coming to the city – especially when it comes to health. The city is making major strides, she said, in increasing park space and in its commitment to a resolution passed by the City Council in 2011 that advocates for policies that improve residents' health. Here's what Martinez, who also serves as the director of the Alliance for a Healthy Orange County, had to say.
Q. Does the city receive state or other funding for health-related programs?
Q. How is the city addressing walking and biking?
A. We as a council made a commitment to integrating complete streets in the city. We passed a resolution. We are also updating our circulation elements which will include a bike and pedestrian master plan, for the first time ever. It's our commitment to active transportation.
Q. How does the city recognize those that promote healthy lifestyles?
A. We've had a committee in place for the past two years, of nonprofits and businesses, that gives input in how to move the city forward. It was instrumental in creating a smoke-free park zone. (She also points to Active Living in Santa Ana, Safe and Active Living United District, and Building Healthy Communities as key health groups.)
Q. What's being done to increase the number of parks in the city?
A. We knew that we were going to have issues, such as the lack of open space, that created issues with kids being overweight – and another issue is the safety component. There is a gang problem and drug problem in the city because it's an urban city and so that also affects the quality of life of young people and their families. (Some) are scared even with the park access that they do have. So we are having to address these issues all at once. We are addressing them with a holistic approach, with a partnership with the school district (and) the various nonprofits, because at the end of the day, we know that the city government can't do it all, it has to be a collaborative effort, a personal effort from the residents themselves.
Q. Why are plans being put into motion now?
A. As the director of the Alliance, I am going back and asking, 'What is it that this city accomplished? What is that other cities accomplished? If they haven't gotten anywhere, what can my organization do to help them?' We realize that there are issues with funding, we know cities have taken a big hit. So we have these city regulations from several years ago. We're saying let's backtrack because we need to keep out in the forefront. Santa Ana has been a model for the county. Being a council member for the city, I have the opportunity to hold my city accountable and to ensure that we are moving in the right direction and really setting some policies that can be a model that we make a commitment to. The fruits of labor have really come to the forefront for Santa Ana because of the dedicated staff that we have and also my colleagues on the council and their commitment to public health.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
